Skip to main content
Haney Strategy
Buyer Relevance

Strip the Logos Off Your Website

Could a buyer tell your website from four competitors' with the logos covered? If not, you do not have a copywriting problem. You have a positioning problem, and it is quietly costing you margin.

Cover the logo on your homepage and four competitors', and read only the words. If you cannot tell which one is yours, that is not a copywriting problem, it is a positioning problem, and because buyers who cannot tell providers apart default to the cheaper one, sameness quietly costs you margin. The fix is not better adjectives. It is win-loss analysis and segmentation to surface the difference you already have, then the nerve to say the narrower, truer thing it lets you say.

Jim HaneyJune 24, 20267 min read

From my desk, June 24.

Here is a test. Pull up your homepage. Then pull up four competitors you respect. Cover the logo on all five, the name, the colors, the founder's headshot, anything that gives it away, and read only the words.

Can you tell which one is yours?

Most leaders cannot. One hero line says trusted partner. The next says tailored solutions. The third says people-first service, decades of experience, technology that works as hard as you do. Strip the names off and five websites blur into one website that happens to have five phone numbers.

If that is your result, I want to be precise about what just happened, because the wrong diagnosis is expensive. You do not have a copywriting problem. You have a positioning problem. And positioning problems get paid for at the bottom of the invoice, every month, whether you notice or not.

Whether you run a small or mid-market company, an office technology dealership, an MSP, or a professional services firm, the homepage test plays out the same way.

Fresh words on a flat position

Most people hear "your site sounds like everyone else" and reach for a writer. Make it pop. Punch up the headline. I understand the instinct, and good writing matters. But if the position underneath the words is the same as everyone else's, better words just make the sameness rhyme. You end up with a more polished version of the exact thing your buyer already cannot tell apart.

Copywriting is the paint. Positioning is the floor plan. You can repaint a room laid out identically to the four next door, and from the doorway it still reads as the same room. So the real question is not whether your words are good. It is whether they could be lifted, word for word, onto a competitor's site without anyone noticing. If they could, the words were never the problem.

It is not just you

Before you take this personally, look up. This is not your imagination, and it is not new. Back in 2021, Gartner found that 64 percent of surveyed B2B customers could not tell the difference between one brand's digital experience and another's. That is the whole of B2B, not one corner of it, and it was years before generative AI started writing everyone's copy.

And the people producing the messaging know it. In a 2025 Wynter survey of B2B SaaS marketing leaders, 94 percent admitted their own brand messaging barely stands out. Only 6 percent called it truly distinctive. That is the corner of B2B with the biggest marketing teams and the most money pointed at this exact problem, and it still cannot get clear of the pack. If budget and a full marketing department cannot buy a way out of sameness, a dealer's ad spend or a lean MSP team was never the reason yours blends in either. Almost nobody fixes it, which is exactly why fixing it works.

The opposite test

So run the same test on your own page, one line at a time. Here is the fastest diagnostic I know, the one I run on every site before I touch a word: for each line, ask whether a competitor would ever claim the opposite.

What the homepage saysYour trusted partner.The question it does not answerTrusted by who, for what, instead of which alternative?
What the homepage saysTailored solutions for your business.The question it does not answerTailored how, and for which kind of business specifically?
What the homepage saysPeople-first, award-winning service.The question it does not answerAs opposed to the competitor advertising people-last service?
What the homepage saysDecades of combined experience.The question it does not answerDoing what, exactly, that the next site cannot also claim?

I am not throwing stones. I have written lines like these, believed in them at the time, and watched them do nothing. Look at what they share: nobody advertises untrustworthy partners, one-size-fits-none solutions, or service that puts itself first. If the opposite of your claim is something no sane company would ever say, your claim is not telling the buyer anything. It is benefit-shaped noise.

What passes the test sounds nothing like that table. It is specific, it is falsifiable, and it is the kind of claim a competitor who cannot back it up will not dare to copy. A line like "we answer every ticket in under fifteen minutes or the month is free" is either true of you or it is not, and that is exactly the point. I am not handing you that line. You need your own, and the next section is where you go dig it up.

Sameness is a margin decision

Here is why this is not a branding nicety. When a buyer cannot tell two providers apart, they fall back on the one number every option still carries: price. Indistinguishable is a synonym for interchangeable, and interchangeable things compete on price. That is the entire definition of a commodity. And it does not stop at one deal.

  1. The buyer cannot tell you apart
  2. The decision falls to price
  3. You discount to win it
  4. That lower number becomes the anchor
  5. Every renewal reprices from there

That last step is the one that quietly hurts, and it is the one no quote ever shows. I have watched good companies leave real money on the table this way, not because their service was worse, but because their website gave the buyer no reason to value it higher.

Sameness does not show up on the marketing report. It shows up on the P&L, in the gap between the price you quote and the price you settle for.

You are more different than you sound

Now the good news, and it is bigger than it sounds. Most companies that sound the same are not actually the same. They have simply gone blind to their own edge.

Positioning expert April Dunford calls this the "No Differentiation" Illusion. The company is genuinely different from the alternatives, but the team cannot see that difference through the buyer's eyes. As she puts it, "most weak positioning comes from unevenly distributed customer and product knowledge across the team."

It hides because it is obvious to you. You live it every day, so it stops registering as remarkable. The homepage got written by whoever was closest to the website, not whoever was closest to the truth. So you do not invent a difference. You go find the one you already have. Four moves, in order:

  1. Run win-loss analysis. Call the customers who chose you and ask the real question, not "are you happy" but "what would you have done if we did not exist, and what almost made you pick someone else." Then call a few who did not choose you. The pattern in those answers, in the buyer's own words, is your position. Start with the wins; understanding why you win matters more than cataloguing why you lose.
  2. Ask the room, not the brochure. The thing that sets you apart usually lives in one person's head or one step of how you deliver. Get it out of there and onto the page where the buyer can actually see it.
  3. Pick the buyer you are unmistakably right for. You are not the same to everyone. Choose the segment where what sets you apart is obvious, and write the site to them, not to the widest possible audience you can imagine.
  4. Say the thing only you would say. Go back to the lift test. If a competitor could paste your line onto their site and it would still be true, rewrite until the paste would be a lie.

This is unglamorous work. It is interviews and pattern-matching, not a tagline session. It is also the only kind of differentiation that survives contact with a skeptical buyer, because you did not make it up. You went and got it.

The nerve to be narrower

There is one more reason sites end up sounding the same, and it is not skill. It is nerve. A position that actually distinguishes you has to be specific enough to be wrong for somebody. The moment you say exactly who you are for and what you will not compromise on, a slice of the market reads it and thinks, that is not us.

That feels like losing a prospect, so the safe move is to soften it, widen it, hedge it, until the line offends no one and excludes no one and, in the same stroke, distinguishes you from no one. If nobody ever self-selects out of your message, nobody is self-selecting in either.

The willingness to say the narrower, truer thing, and lose the prospects it was never going to fit, is most of the job. It is also the part most companies flinch from, which is exactly what turns it into an advantage instead of just a best practice.

Why the window is open right now

One last thing, because the timing changes the math. Everyone now reaches for the same handful of AI tools to write their copy, and the same tools, fed the same prompts, drift toward the same words. Most people paste what comes back and ship it with barely an edit, so the sameness compounds.

You can already spot the seams.

None of it is wrong, exactly. It is just unmistakably machine-made, and once you can see it, you cannot unsee it.

Look at LinkedIn. A year ago, an AI-generated image in the feed still felt novel, even a little creative. Today it is a wall of them, and the eye slides right past. Everyone reached for the same easy button at the same time, so the very thing that was supposed to help you stand out is now the thing that makes you blend in. There is even early evidence for the pattern: when Italy briefly banned ChatGPT in 2023, a London Business School working paper found that businesses cut off from the tool went back to producing noticeably more distinctive content.

Which means the bar to be recognizable has never been lower, and clearing it takes more deliberate work than it used to, because everyone else is pressing that easy button harder than ever. When a whole category is racing to produce the same competent, forgettable middle, the company that sounds unmistakably like itself does not have to be loud to stand out. It just has to be real, specific, and willing to mean it.

So cover the logos. If you cannot tell yourself apart, the fix was never a sharper sentence. It is the nerve to find the one true thing only you can say, and to say it even when it costs you the prospects it was never for. Do that, and the buyer can finally tell why you are worth more, and the gap between the price you quote and the price you settle for finally starts to close.

Finding that one true thing is where a Strategic Roadmap starts.

All signal. No noise.

Frequently asked questions

How do I tell if my website has a positioning problem or a copywriting problem?

Run the strip-the-logos test. Cover the name and branding on your homepage and four competitors', then read only the words. If you cannot tell which one is yours, the words are not the issue, the position underneath them is. The confirming check is the lift test: if a competitor could paste your homepage line onto their site and it would still be true, it is not positioning, it is wallpaper.

Why does looking like my competitors cost me money?

Because a buyer who cannot tell two providers apart defaults to the only variable left that they can read, which is price. Indistinguishable means interchangeable, and interchangeable things compete as commodities. Worse, the first discount resets the anchor, so future renewals reprice from the lower number. The cost does not show up on the marketing report. It shows up on the P&L.

What is the "No Differentiation" Illusion?

It is a term from positioning expert April Dunford for a common trap: a company believes it has no real edge, when in fact it is genuinely differentiated and simply cannot see that difference through the buyer's eyes. As she puts it, most weak positioning comes from customer and product knowledge that is unevenly distributed across the team. The fix is not invention, it is excavation: win-loss analysis and segmentation to surface the advantage you already have.

How do I find what actually makes my company different?

Go get it from the people who know, do not brainstorm it. Interview the customers who chose you, starting with why they picked you over the alternative, then talk to a few who did not. Pull the thing that sets you apart out of one salesperson's head or one step of your delivery and onto the page. Then pick the segment you are unmistakably right for and write to them, not to everyone. You find your difference, you do not make it up.

Is AI making B2B marketing sound more the same?

It is accelerating it. When everyone prompts the same handful of models, the output converges on the same competent, forgettable middle, faster than ever, and most people ship it with barely an edit. The tells are everywhere once you see them: the same overused words, the same rhythms, the same stock imagery filling every feed. The upside is the flip side. When the whole category sounds identical, sounding unmistakably like yourself becomes a bigger advantage than it has ever been, and the work it takes is exactly what your competitors will not do.

Share

Want this thinking applied to your business?

Signal Notes can sharpen the thinking. A strategy call turns it into a plan.